Grammarly is worth keeping for most people, except if you write in more than one language.

You’re not here because you’re curious about grammar checkers. You’re here because you’re paying for one and something about it has started to bother you. Maybe it was the renewal charge. Maybe it was the extension slowing down a text box. Maybe you looked up one day and the company had a different name.

I went looking properly. I read the policy pages themselves, checked prices at the checkout, and pulled the actual court filing. Everything below was checked on 17 August 2026.

The conclusion surprised me a bit: for most people reading this, leaving is the wrong move. But there’s one group for whom it’s obviously right, and hardly anyone writes about them.

The short version, if you only read one section

Stay if you use Grammarly the way most people do, which is to say everywhere at once. It works in your browser, your email, your Slack, your phone keyboard and your Word documents from a single install, and nothing else comes close to that. Switch to annual billing at $12 a month and turn off the training toggle, and most of the reasons people cite for leaving stop applying.

Leave if you write in any language other than English. This is the clean case. Grammarly only checks English variants. If half your week is in German or Turkish or Spanish, you’re paying for a tool that goes quiet for half your week.

Leave if you write long things. Books, dissertations, reports. Grammarly is built for sentences, and ProWritingAid is built for manuscripts.

Consider leaving entirely if you own a recent iPhone or already pay for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, because the free tools built into those now cover more than you’d expect.

Leave, or rather add something else, if the messages that cost you time are personal rather than professional. Every tool in this post is tuned for clear and professional writing. None of them reads a message to your sister. That gap is why I ended up building Subtext, so weigh what I say about it accordingly.

Everything after this is me showing my working.

Grammarly is called Superhuman now, and it’s been an eventful year

On 29 October 2025 the parent company rebranded to Superhuman¹, pulling Grammarly, the Coda workspace and Superhuman Mail under one name and launching an agent called Superhuman Go. The writing product is still called Grammarly. The plans changed though: Premium and the old Business plan were folded into a single tier called Pro.

Then two things happened that are worth knowing about before you renew.

On 11 March 2026, investigative journalist Julia Angwin filed a class action² over a feature called Expert Review, which had launched the previous August. It generated writing feedback and attributed it to real, named journalists and authors who had never agreed to any of it. The case is Angwin v. Superhuman Platform, Inc.³, No. 26 Civ. 02005-JGK, in the Southern District of New York. Grammarly disabled the feature the same day. Angwin’s lawyer said he’d since heard from 40 to 50 more people who objected to being included.

CEO Shishir Mehrotra apologised on LinkedIn, and later told TechRadar⁴ that the feature wasn’t good for experts or for users, while also saying the lawsuit is without merit and that the feature had been pulled before the filing.

Then on 23 June 2026, Superhuman acquired GPTZero⁵, the AI detection company, which had around 19 million registered users.

Why the GPTZero deal matters if you’re a student

The company selling you writing help now owns two of the main tools for catching AI writing. I don’t think that’s sinister. I do think you should know how badly detectors perform on some people’s writing.

The reference study here is Liang et al., published in Patterns in July 2023⁶. Five Stanford researchers ran seven widely used GPT detectors against two sets of human-written essays: 91 TOEFL essays written by non-native English speakers, and 88 US eighth-grade essays from the Hewlett Foundation’s ASAP dataset. Accuracy on the eighth-grade essays was near perfect. On the TOEFL essays, the detectors misclassified more than half as AI-generated, at an average false positive rate of 61.22%. All seven detectors agreed on 18 of the 91 essays. At least one detector flagged 89 of the 91.

The mechanism is the uncomfortable part. Non-native writers use less linguistic variation, which produces lower text perplexity, which is exactly what perplexity-based detectors read as machine-written. Asking ChatGPT to enrich the vocabulary in those same essays made the flags mostly disappear.

To be fair to the other side: GPTZero published a response in October 2023 arguing that ESL bias in detection was an outdated narrative, and shipped an updated model. An independent evaluation in the Pangram technical report⁷ put the new model’s false positive rate on that same TOEFL benchmark at 7.7%, or 1.1% if borderline results are read generously. Much better. Still not zero, on a benchmark the model’s builders knew about.

Two practical takeaways. Grammarly’s Authorship feature works differently from all of this, because it watches typing and paste events while you write instead of analysing a finished document, which makes it a far more defensible way to demonstrate you wrote something. And if you’re a non-native English speaker, keep your drafts.

Why people actually cancel, in order of how often it comes up

I went through the review aggregators and forums instead of guessing. The pattern is consistent.

Billing is the number one complaint, by a distance. Not features. Billing. Subscriptions auto-renew, refunds are issued only where legally required, and you can’t cancel from mobile. The gap in the ratings tells the story: Grammarly holds 4.7 out of 5 on G2⁸ across 12,969 reviews and 4.7 on Capterra across 7,210, but 3.5 on Trustpilot across 10,394. G2 and Capterra skew toward business users who didn’t personally get charged. Trustpilot is where consumers go when a card gets debited unexpectedly.

The price gap between billing cycles. Pro is $12 a month on annual billing, $20 a month if you pay quarterly, and $30 a month if you pay monthly⁸. That’s a 2.5x spread for the same product. A lot of people who feel ripped off are simply on the wrong cycle.

Over-correction. Grammarly pushes toward short sentences, active voice and formal neutrality. For a work email that’s exactly right. For anything with a voice, it sands the edges off. This complaint comes almost entirely from people writing fiction, essays or anything personal.

The browser extension. Input lag, conflicts with rich-text editors, the widget sitting on top of the text box. I take this seriously because Grammarly’s own engineering team publishes about text input lag⁹ as a tracked performance metric, and because the conflicts show up in developer bug threads: Slate.js, the editor framework behind a lot of modern web apps, has an open discussion¹⁰ about exactly this.

Privacy defaults. If you’re on Free, Premium or a single-user Pro account, the training toggle is on by default¹¹. Enterprise and education accounts are opted out automatically. You can switch it off at account.grammarly.com/security/privacy, and it takes about ten seconds.

The reason to leave that nobody writes about: it only speaks English

Grammarly checks English. American, British, Canadian, Australian and Indian variants, and that’s the list.

I live in Berlin. Roughly half of what I write in a given week isn’t in English. For that half, a Grammarly subscription is doing nothing at all. I’ve read a dozen “best Grammarly alternatives” articles while researching this and almost none of them lead with this, which tells you something about who writes those articles.

If you’re multilingual, you’re not really choosing between grammar checkers. You’re choosing between a tool that works for part of your writing and one that works for all of it.

What Grammarly still does better than everyone else

I want to be fair here, because the case for staying is stronger than the internet suggests.

It’s everywhere from one install. Browser, Windows, macOS, Word, Google Docs, and keyboards on iOS and Android. It overlays custom input fields in things like Salesforce, Jira and Zendesk without you copying text anywhere. Every alternative below is worse at this. Most are much worse.

The mobile keyboards. If you write seriously on your phone, this is the feature you’ll miss within a day of leaving.

Plagiarism checking is bundled. ProWritingAid sells manuscript analysis as separate Story Credits that sit outside every subscription tier¹², which is a cost people don’t notice until they need it.

Authorship. As above, it’s process-based, which puts it in a different category from the detectors that produced those 61% false positives.

It’s genuinely good for ESL writers and people with dyslexia. Always-on correction in every app, without having to decide to go and use a tool, is a different experience from opening an editor. Don’t underestimate how much of the value is in never having to think about it.

The alternatives, sorted by what you’re actually trying to do

I’ve grouped these by job instead of ranking them, because a ranked list of writing tools is close to meaningless. The right answer depends entirely on what you write.

If you write in more than one language: LanguageTool

Grammar, spelling and style across 30-plus languages, which is the main reason to be here. Premium starts around $4.99 a month on annual billing, and LanguageTool’s own help pages list €19.90 a month¹³ for monthly billing and €56.90 per user per year for teams.

One change matters more than the price. The browser extension is now Premium-only¹⁴, with checks up to 100,000 characters, which LanguageTool’s own help centre describes as significantly more than the former free limit. If your plan was to leave Grammarly for LanguageTool’s free extension, that plan expired. The free web editor and the API still exist, and the API documentation¹⁵ puts free requests at 20,000 characters and Premium at 60,000.

The real feature is that the core engine is open source and you can self-host it, which means your text never leaves your own infrastructure. Grammarly cannot offer that and never will.

One thing most reviews skip: LanguageTool is owned by Learneo, the same company that owns QuillBot. The privacy policy at languagetool.org¹⁶ is the Learneo policy. A revised version takes effect on 21 August 2026, so if you’re reading this later than that, check it again. I’d have preferred a simpler answer here. That’s the answer there is.

What it doesn’t do: tone detection at Grammarly’s depth, plagiarism checking, or anything agentic.

If you write books: ProWritingAid

Twenty-five-plus reports on pacing, dialogue tags, sentence variety, repetition and readability. It integrates with Scrivener, which no other tool on this list does properly.

Pricing changed significantly in 2026 and the old numbers are still circulating. Current figures: free plan capped at 500 words per check, Premium at $30 a month or $120 a year¹⁷, Premium Pro at $36 a month or $144 a year, and lifetime licences at $399 for Premium and $699 for Premium Pro. The annual price rose 52% from $79, tracked across 18 pricing snapshots¹⁸ since November 2025.

The lifetime licence is the interesting one. At $399 against $120 a year, it pays for itself somewhere in year four.

What it doesn’t do: fast real-time correction. It’s slower than Grammarly and report-heavy. You use it after the draft exists, in deliberate passes, and it has no team management. Refunds are three days on annual and lifetime plans, and monthly plans aren’t refundable at all.

If you rewrite constantly: QuillBot, with a warning

Paraphrasing in nine modes, summarising, grammar checking, citation generation. Free tier caps paraphrasing at 125 words with two modes. Premium is $19.95 monthly or $99.95 annually¹⁹, which works out to $8.33 a month, with a student rate around $6.25.

Now the warning, and this is the part I’d want to know. QuillBot changed its privacy policy on 8 November 2025. Its own help centre states plainly that it previously asked for consent²⁰ to store your text inputs and will no longer require it, storing inputs for all extension users by default. There are now two separate controls: storage, which everyone can opt out of, and training, which only account holders can opt out of. Team Plan inputs are excluded²¹ from training.

So if you’re leaving Grammarly over privacy and landing on QuillBot, you’ve moved in the wrong direction. That’s not a knock on the product, which is good at what it does. It’s just worth being honest that the grass isn’t automatically greener.

If you want your sentences shorter: Hemingway

Highlights long sentences, passive voice and adverbs, and gives you a readability grade. The web app is free. The desktop app is $19.99 as a one-time purchase. Hemingway Editor Plus, which adds AI rewriting, is $10 a month or $100 a year²² according to Hemingway’s own billing pages, working out to $8.33 monthly on the annual plan.

It doesn’t do grammar or spelling properly. It measures readability, and that’s the whole job. I’d pair it with something else instead of treating it as a replacement.

If you work across languages professionally: DeepL Write

Rephrasing and refinement from the translation company, strongest on European language pairs. Write Pro is $7.49 per user per month²³ on annual billing as an add-on to Individual and Team plans, and included at no extra charge in Business and Enterprise.

Important correction to something I’ve seen repeated everywhere: DeepL’s free tier is not private. DeepL’s terms state that free-tier text is retained for a limited period to train and improve their neural networks, and the free terms prohibit submitting personal data at all. Paid tiers delete text after processing and never use it for training. Several comparison articles present DeepL as blanket privacy-safe. That’s only true if you’re paying.

If you rephrase sentences: Wordtune

Contextual rewriting with tone controls. The free plan gives you 10 rewrites a day. Advanced is $13.99 a month or about $6.99 annually²⁴, and Unlimited is $19.99 monthly or about $9.99 annually.

Two things the comparison posts get wrong. It’s a browser extension plus a web app plus an iOS app, with no proper Word or Google Docs plugin, and the rewriting output is English-focused with no multilingual rewriting despite the translation features. Also, its Traceless mode, the one that deletes your input seconds after generation, is a Business and Enterprise feature²⁵. Individual subscribers don’t get it.

If you write academic work: Trinka or Paperpal

Trinka is built for academic and technical English and has a free tier. Paperpal is broader and covers more of the submission workflow. Both handle the conventions of research writing that general tools flatten. I could only find current pricing for these through third-party trackers, which put Trinka in the region of $7 a month and Paperpal around $25, so check their own pricing pages before you commit.

If you write documentation: Vale

Free, open source, and it lints prose the way a linter checks code. It enforces a style guide across Markdown and text files in your CI pipeline. No character limits, no subscription, no cloud. If you work in docs-as-code, it’s the correct answer and it isn’t close.

If you already own the ecosystem: possibly nothing

This is the section I’d have wanted someone to write for me.

Apple Intelligence Writing Tools are built into iOS 18.1 and macOS Sequoia 15.1 onward, on supported hardware²⁶, meaning iPhone 15 Pro or any iPhone 16, plus M-series iPads and Macs. Proofread, Rewrite and Summarize work in most text fields including third-party apps, and language support expanded to 16 languages²⁷ with the iOS 26 releases. Processing happens on-device with heavier requests going to Private Cloud Compute.

Where it stops: no underlines as you type the way Grammarly does, no plagiarism check, no team style guides, and the rewrites are conservative.

Microsoft Editor covers basic spelling and grammar free in Word and Edge. The deeper Copilot features need a paid Microsoft 365 licence, and Microsoft’s own comparison page²⁸ spells out what the free version leaves out.

Google Docs has free spelling, grammar and Smart Compose. “Help me write” and the tone controls come through Gemini, included in Workspace Business Standard²⁹ at about $14 per user per month and above. Business Starter at around $7 gets very little.

If you’re on an iPhone 16 writing casual emails and messages, you may be paying $144 a year for something your phone already does. Test it for a week before you renew.

The privacy section, where the results are not what you’d expect

I went into this assuming Grammarly would come out worst. It didn’t.

The honest summary: Grammarly’s default is opt-out and the toggle is easy to find. QuillBot moved from opt-in to opt-out during this period, which is a genuine regression. DeepL’s free tier is the one I’d actually warn people about, because a lot of people paste work documents into it assuming otherwise.

If privacy is your reason for leaving Grammarly, the only two answers that fully deliver are self-hosted LanguageTool and Apple’s on-device processing. Everything else is a matter of degree.

Why every “best Grammarly alternatives” list ranks ProWritingAid first

I checked this because the uniformity was suspicious.

Almost all of these articles are affiliate-monetised. LanguageTool’s programme pays up to 50% per sale³⁰ plus about $1.10 per lead through Awin. QuillBot pays 10% to 20%³¹ on a recurring basis through PartnerStack. Grammarly itself pays³² $0.20 per free signup and $20 per premium sale. ProWritingAid pays a flat $20³³, one-time, on a 30-day cookie.

Now look at that list again. ProWritingAid pays the least of the four and ranks first almost everywhere, which means commission rate isn’t what’s driving the order. What ProWritingAid has is negotiated reader discount codes, and those indicate a direct relationship with the publisher instead of a generic network link. Kindlepreneur routes through a cloaked /click/ProWritingAid/ redirect. DemandSage ranks it first while promoting a Grammarly discount. SoftwareTestingHelp offers a reader-specific ProWritingAid code.

None of that makes ProWritingAid a bad tool. It’s an excellent tool for novelists. It just means the “#1 pick” label is describing a business relationship. It isn’t describing a test result.

The other tell is stale pricing. A lot of these articles still list ProWritingAid at $79 a year, which hasn’t been true since early 2026¹⁸. If a comparison post has the wrong price, nobody has opened the product recently.

For what it’s worth: there are no affiliate links in this post. I have nothing to sell you from this list.

What none of these tools actually do

This is the part I found most interesting, because the gaps are consistent across every single tool.

Structure across a long document. They all work sentence by sentence. None of them will tell you that chapter four should come before chapter three.

Consistency across a set of documents. Keeping terminology and style aligned across forty files is barely solved. Vale and PerfectIt get partway there.

Regional and dialect variation. Every tool normalises toward a standard register, which means valid regional English gets flagged as wrong. If you write in Indian English or Nigerian English, you’ll spend a lot of time dismissing suggestions.

Domain precision. No editor validates a live statutory citation or checks specialist medical terminology against a current clinical database. In law and medicine you still need a human.

Emotional tone in personal messages. This is the gap I care about most, and it’s the reason I ended up building in this space. Every tool on this list optimises for “professional and clear.” None of them help with the message where clear isn’t the problem. The one where you need to set a boundary without sounding cold, or say the hard thing without the three apology paragraphs at the end. Grammar checkers tell you a sentence is passive. They don’t tell you it reads as passive-aggressive.

That’s the job Subtext does. It reads the thread and the draft together, tells you how the message is likely to land on the person about to read it, names the wording creating that impression, and leaves the fix to you in your own words. It works in fourteen languages, on your phone or in the browser, free to start.

I’d sooner say plainly that this is a different job than pretend it belongs on the list above. If what you need is a grammar checker, buy a grammar checker. The two solve different problems and most people writing seriously end up wanting both.

So, stay or go?

Stay if you write across many apps, you rely on the phone keyboard, you’re an ESL writer or have dyslexia and want always-on help, or you need admin controls and authorship evidence. Switch to annual billing and turn the training toggle off, and you’ve addressed most of what people complain about.

Go if you write in another language, go to LanguageTool. If you write books, go to ProWritingAid, and buy the lifetime licence if you’re sure. If you paraphrase constantly, QuillBot, with the privacy settings changed on day one. If you work across languages professionally, DeepL Write Pro, and never the free tier for anything confidential.

Go nowhere if you own a recent iPhone or already pay for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and your writing is mostly casual. Try the built-in tools for a week first.

Add Subtext if the writing that actually costs you time is the personal message rather than the professional document. It sits alongside a grammar checker rather than replacing one.

The thing I’d genuinely push back on, if you’re mid-cancellation right now: check which billing cycle you’re on before you decide the price is the problem. A surprising number of people leaving over $30 a month are three clicks from paying $12.

Now, where you might disagree with me. I’ve weighted breadth of coverage heavily, because that’s how most people use these tools. If you write in one place, in one app, with one workflow, that weighting is wrong for you and you should discount most of my case for staying. And if you think the Expert Review episode and the GPTZero purchase point at a company drifting away from the thing you bought it for, that’s a defensible read. I don’t share it, but it’s not unreasonable.

---

Think I’ve been unfair to a tool you rely on, or know an alternative I’ve missed? Tell me on LinkedIn.

Samet Durgun is the co-founder of Subtext, an app that catches the emotional tone of your messages and rewrites them in your own voice. He’s based in Berlin.

Sources

Every link above goes to the primary source where one exists, numbered in order of appearance. All prices and product features checked on 17 August 2026. Where I’ve cited a policy, I’ve linked the policy page itself. Where two sources disagreed on a price, I’ve used the vendor’s own page or given the range. The last four entries are background reading rather than claims made above.

1. Grammarly. “Grammarly Rebrands Company as Superhuman, Introduces Superhuman Suite and Superhuman Go.” Grammarly Blog, November 2025. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/company/announcing-company-rebrand-to-superhuman/
2. Scire, Sarah. “Journalist Julia Angwin files class action lawsuit over Grammarly’s AI ‘sloppelgangers’.” Nieman Journalism Lab, Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 12 March 2026. https://www.niemanlab.org/2026/03/journalist-julia-angwin-files-class-action-lawsuit-over-grammarlys-ai-sloppelgangers/
3. Peter Romer-Friedman Law PLLC. “Class Action Alleges That Grammarly Misappropriated the Names of Journalists and Authors Through its ‘Expert Review’.” March 2026. Case: Angwin v. Superhuman Platform, Inc., No. 26 Civ. 02005-JGK (S.D.N.Y.). https://prf-law.com/current-cases/class-action-alleges-that-grammarly-misappropriated-the-names-of-journalists-and-authors-through-its-expert-review
4. TechRadar. “‘The feature was not a good feature’: Grammarly CEO admits Expert Review didn’t work.” 2026. https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/the-feature-was-not-a-good-feature-grammarly-ceo-admits-experts-review-didnt-work-but-you-may-not-like-what-replaces-it
5. TechCrunch. “Superhuman acquires AI detection startup GPTZero.” 23 June 2026. https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/23/superhuman-acquires-ai-detection-startup-gptzero/
6. Liang, Weixin; Yuksekgonul, Mert; Mao, Yining; Wu, Eric; Zou, James. “GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers.” Patterns, vol. 4, no. 7, 100779, Cell Press, 10 July 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779. Open access, CC BY-NC-ND. Sample: 91 TOEFL essays and 88 US eighth-grade essays (Hewlett Foundation ASAP dataset), across seven commercial detectors. Authors declared no competing interests. https://www.cell.com/patterns/fulltext/S2666-3899(23)00130-7
7. Emi, Bradley and Spero, Max. “Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifier.” arXiv:2402.14873, 2024. Note: published by a company selling a competing detector, so treat the comparative framing as self-interested. The GPTZero false positive figures are reported against the same 91-essay TOEFL benchmark. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14873
8. CheckThat. “Grammarly Pricing 2026: Plans and Competitor Comparison.” May 2026. https://checkthat.ai/brands/grammarly/pricing
9. Grammarly Engineering. “How We Reduced Text Input Lag to Improve Web Performance.” Grammarly Engineering Blog. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/engineering/reducing-text-input-lag/
10. Slate.js GitHub Discussions. “Performance/lag issues with Grammarly extension?” Discussion #5270. https://github.com/ianstormtaylor/slate/discussions/5270
11. Grammarly Support. “Product Improvement and Training Control.” https://support.grammarly.com/hc/en-us/articles/25555503115277-Product-Improvement-and-Training-Control
12. ComparEdge. “ProWritingAid Pricing 2026: Free, Premium and Pro Plans.” Verified 8 July 2026. https://comparedge.com/tools/prowritingaid/pricing
13. LanguageTool Help Centre. “What subscriptions does LanguageTool offer?” March 2026. https://help.languagetool.org/hc/en-us/articles/39254510973335-What-subscriptions-does-LanguageTool-offer
14. LanguageTool Help Centre. “What features are available in the new premium-only version of the LanguageTool browser extension?” March 2026. https://help.languagetool.org/hc/en-us/articles/39254502438551-What-features-are-available-in-the-new-premium-only-version-of-the-LanguageTool-browser-extension
15. LanguageTool. “LanguageTool HTTP API documentation.” https://languagetool.org/http-api/
16. Learneo, Inc. “Privacy Policy.” Served at languagetool.org, revised version effective 21 August 2026. https://languagetool.org/legal/privacy
17. MakerStack. “ProWritingAid Review (2026): Pricing, Features and Honest Verdict.” July 2026. https://makerstack.co/reviews/prowritingaid-review/
18. SaaS Price Pulse. “ProWritingAid Pricing 2026: Plans, Limits and Changes.” https://www.saaspricepulse.com/tools/prowritingaid
19. QuillBot. “How much is QuillBot Premium?” February 2026. https://quillbot.com/blog/frequently-asked-questions/how-much-is-quillbot-premium/
20. QuillBot Help Centre. “About the November 8, 2025 Privacy Policy Update.” https://help.quillbot.com/hc/en-us/articles/35449639832983-About-the-November-8-2025-Privacy-Policy-Update
21. QuillBot Help Centre. “How does QuillBot use my data?” June 2026. https://help.quillbot.com/hc/en-us/articles/360056530894-How-does-Quillbot-use-my-data
22. Hemingway Editor. “Editor Plus Billing FAQs.” https://hemingwayapp.com/help/support-articles/billing-faqs
23. CheckThat. “DeepL Pricing 2026: Cost and Competitors Compared.” July 2026. https://checkthat.ai/brands/deepl/pricing
24. HyperWrite. “Wordtune Pricing Plans Compared.” April 2026, verified against Wordtune’s official pricing page. https://www.hyperwriteai.com/blog/wordtune-pricing
25. Wordtune (AI21 Labs Ltd). “Terms of Use.” https://www.wordtune.com/business/terms-of-use
26. Apple Support. “How to get Apple Intelligence.” https://support.apple.com/en-us/121115
27. 9to5Mac. “Apple Intelligence has 20+ brand new features in iOS 26.” 15 October 2025. https://9to5mac.com/2025/10/15/apple-intelligence-new-features-in-ios-26-full-list/
28. Microsoft Support. “What’s the difference between Microsoft Copilot (free) and Copilot in Microsoft 365?” https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/what-s-the-difference-between-microsoft-copilot-free-and-copilot-in-microsoft-365
29. eesel AI. “Gemini for Workspace pricing 2026: Plans and costs.” https://www.eesel.ai/blog/gemini-workspace-pricing
30. Awin. “LanguageTool affiliate programme, merchant profile.” https://ui.awin.com/merchant-profile/49397
31. QuillBot. “QuillBot Affiliates.” https://quillbot.com/affiliates
32. Grammarly. “Grammarly Affiliate Program.” https://www.grammarly.com/affiliates
33. Awin. “ProWritingAid affiliate programme, merchant profile.” https://ui.awin.com/merchant-profile/89751
34. SiliconANGLE. “Grammarly parent Superhuman buys AI detector GPTZero.” 24 June 2026. https://siliconangle.com/2026/06/24/grammarly-parent-superhuman-buys-ai-detector-gptzero/
35. Privacy Guides. “Language Tools.” https://www.privacyguides.org/en/language-tools/
36. Grammarly. “The Grammarly User Trust Center.” https://www.grammarly.com/trust
37. eesel AI. “Grammarly pricing 2026: every plan, real costs, and the billing traps to avoid.” June 2026. https://www.eesel.ai/blog/grammarly-pricing